Q-시리즈 LDV를 이용한 비접촉식 교량 변형률 측정

Application note | Civil infrastructure

Q-series LDV systems measure dense displacement and velocity profiles along a bridge without installing strain gauges. For beam-like, bending-dominated response, those profiles can be converted into curvature and surface strain using Euler-Bernoulli beam theory.

65/128simultaneous measurement points, depending on Q-series configuration
No gaugesremote strain-ready data without bonding sensors to the structure
1 lineefficient screening path for bending-led bridge behavior

Why it matters

Bridge strain insight without contact instrumentation

Q-series measurements give engineering teams a faster way to screen bridge behavior: capture many points remotely, recover the displacement profile, and turn the spatial shape into curvature and strain indicators where the structural model supports it.

Measurement workflow

Less setup before useful data

Conventional gauges are valuable, but they add surface preparation, wiring, access planning, and installation time. A remote LDV line can be deployed from a safe viewpoint and repeated during normal traffic or controlled excitation.

No bonded sensorsDense line profileRepeatable geometry

Model choice

Use one line when bending dominates

One-line strain extraction is best suited to beam-like bridge regions where bending drives the response. Near supports, discontinuities, or zones with meaningful axial motion, add a second viewing position so axial and bending terms can be separated.

Bending-led spansSecond view for axial terms
Decide whether remote strain is the right fitBring your bridge type, viewing geometry, and expected loading to a technical discussion.

Method

From LDV displacement to Euler-Bernoulli strain

For a bridge deck or girder segment that can be approximated as an Euler-Bernoulli beam, the vertical displacement shape contains curvature. Surface strain follows from that curvature and the distance from the neutral axis to the measurement surface.

κ(x,t) ≈ ∂2w(x,t)∂x2

εb(x,z,t) = −z · κ(x,t)

Here, w(x,t) is vertical deflection along the measurement line, kappa is curvature, and z is the distance from the neutral axis. In practice, the quality of the spatial derivative depends on point spacing, signal quality, filtering, and geometry calibration.

1

Measure a dense line

Q-series LDV captures many points simultaneously along the bridge soffit or visible structural line during the same vehicle, train, or ambient excitation event.

2

Recover the shape

Velocity signals are processed into displacement or displacement-derived profiles, with geometry and line-of-sight projection handled explicitly.

3

Convert to strain

For bending-led response, curvature is extracted from the spatial profile and converted into surface strain using the section geometry.

Validate the measurement model before field workReview beam assumptions, point spacing, and line-of-sight geometry with an applications engineer.

Geometry

Sensor geometry defines the measurement line

The first practical step is to turn the bridge and sensor setup into a measurement coordinate system. The Q-series unit observes a line of visible points on the bridge soffit or girder. Each point has a known position along the bridge span, a line-of-sight direction back to the sensor, and a spacing to the neighboring points.

That geometry matters because strain is not measured directly at one isolated point. It is inferred from how the bridge shape changes along the line. If point spacing is uneven, if the sensor views the deck at an angle, or if part of the line is closer to a support or discontinuity, those details affect the displacement profile, the spatial derivative, and therefore the curvature and strain estimate.

1. Define the bridge axisMap each laser point to a distance along the span so the profile is treated as a physical bridge line, not just an image row.
2. Account for viewing angleConvert line-of-sight motion into the bridge direction needed by the deflection and curvature model.
3. Use real point spacingUse the actual distance between adjacent samples when differentiating the displacement shape into curvature.
Bridge line and sensor geometry for Q-series strain calculation
Bridge line, sensor positions, and adjacent sample spacing. This full-width graph is the useful part of the slide: it explains what spatial derivative quality depends on.

Field output

Velocity, displacement, and strain remain connected

A single event can be reviewed at multiple levels. The LDV signal starts as velocity, can be integrated into displacement, and can then feed the curvature and strain calculation when the structural assumptions are valid. Showing these traces together helps engineers check whether the derived strain is physically plausible.

Velocity displacement and strain time traces from a bridge measurement
Example output chain for one location: velocity response, displacement response, and strain estimate through a dynamic event.

Dynamic strain vs time

Track strain response during vehicle passages, train crossings, impact events, or controlled excitation.

Curvature along the line

Identify where the bridge shape changes most strongly and where strain concentration is likely.

Repeatable hot spots

Return to the same remote geometry in follow-up campaigns and compare trendable indicators over time.

Turn bridge response into an actionable measurement planChoose the right next step for a one-off field campaign or a continuous monitoring workflow.

Field video

Spatial and temporal bridge strain during high-speed train passage

This field clip shows the spatial and temporal strain profile of a concrete bridge as a high-speed train crosses the structure. It connects the application note’s strain-ready workflow to a real dynamic event, where the response evolves along the bridge line and over time.

Concrete bridge strain profile under high-speed train loading. Open the video on YouTube.

Measurement model

Start simple, then add views when the physics requires it

The bending-dominated model is the fastest bridge-strain workflow. It uses one measurement line and one remote position, then converts deflection curvature into bending strain. For support regions, local discontinuities, or cases where axial motion is not negligible, use two independent line-of-sight measurements to reconstruct in-plane motion in the measurement plane.

Comparison between bending dominated and biaxial bridge strain workflows
Decision support slide shown at full content width: use one-line bending analysis for quick screening; add a second view when axial or local effects matter.

Connected reading

Where this fits in the Ommatidia workflow

This application note connects remote vibrometry, structural health monitoring, and photonic parallel measurement. The same Q-series architecture that captures 65 or 128 points simultaneously also enables spatial derivatives that are impractical with slow point-by-point scans.

Want to test strain-ready bridge vibrometry?

Share the bridge type, access constraints, expected excitation, and available structural model. We can help define whether a single Q-series line is enough or whether a multi-view campaign is more appropriate.

✕

Q-시리즈 LDV를 이용한 비접촉식 교량 변형률 측정

Laser RADAR 한 대가 한 시점만으로 3D 속도를 복원할 수 있나요?

Q2 한 대를 재배치해 필요한 시점을 취득할 수 있지만, 한 방향은 시선방향 속도만 측정합니다. X, Y, Z 운동을 복원하려면 같은 표면을 서로 충분히 독립적인 최소 세 방향에서 관측하고 데이터를 공통 좌표계에 등록해야 합니다.

세 속도 성분은 어떻게 재구성되나요?

각 시점은 점군, 빔 방향과 시선방향 속도를 제공합니다. 구형 기준점으로 시점을 등록하고 대응 표면점의 위상 정렬 측정에서 X, Y, Z를 풉니다. 추가 시점은 최소 결정 해 대신 가중 최소제곱 추정을 지원할 수 있습니다.

재구성 지점의 신뢰성은 무엇으로 판단하나요?

시점 수, 방향 다양성과 기하학적 조건, 등록 품질, 위상 일관성, 신호대잡음비와 잔차를 확인해야 합니다. 방향 형상이 좋지 않으면 여러 스캔이 있어도 관측성이 약할 수 있어 범위와 샘플링을 하나의 캠페인으로 계획합니다.

“변형률 준비”가 변형률이 자동 검증됐다는 뜻인가요?

아닙니다. 재구성된 변위 또는 속도장은 변형률 추정 입력이 될 수 있지만 공간 미분은 등록, 보간 및 측정 잡음을 증폭합니다. 용도에 맞는 메시나 이웃, 좌표 정렬, 필터링, 불확도 및 적합한 기준 검증을 정의해야 합니다.