Automotive NVH testing questions
Use the required engineering output, spatial coverage and test constraints to choose the measurement workflow.
What is automotive NVH testing?
Automotive noise, vibration and harshness testing characterizes how a vehicle, body-in-white, subsystem or component responds to operating and controlled excitation. A useful test links the measured motion to the engineering decision: locating resonances, comparing variants, validating a simulation, diagnosing a source or checking a corrective change. Define the frequency range, operating condition, spatial resolution, reference channels and acceptance criteria before choosing sensors. This keeps a visually impressive vibration map tied to a repeatable and reviewable result.
Why use non-contact vibrometry for vehicle NVH?
Non-contact vibrometry avoids adding sensor mass and cabling to panels, trim, lightweight components and hard-to-reach locations. It can reduce setup effort when many spatial points are needed and preserves the tested structure. Optical access, target return, line of sight, instrument stability, sampling settings and the required motion bandwidth still need to be checked. Use reference sensors or a defined validation route where the programme requires correlation with an established method.
What does Q2 contribute to a full-field NVH test?
Q2 provides 65 simultaneous optical channels and supports up to 1,300 measurement points with 20× spatial oversampling. The workflow can place vibration results on measured geometry so teams can inspect operating-deflection or mode-shape behaviour in spatial context. Q-Series systems measure vibration velocity up to ±155 mm/s. These figures are configuration boundaries, not a universal promise of suitability: working distance, surface return, motion bandwidth, environment and the validation plan determine the achievable result for a specific vehicle test.
When should contact sensors or a hybrid NVH test be used?
Use contact sensors or a hybrid test when the required reference quantity, hidden location, optical obstruction, surface condition or validation procedure makes them the stronger evidence source. Accelerometers can provide durable reference channels, while microphones and force or speed references connect motion to acoustic and operating conditions. A hybrid plan can combine these references with dense non-contact spatial data. Choose the smallest measurement set that answers the decision and document alignment, timing, coordinate systems and uncertainty.
